How Many CFM Do You Need for Effective Welding Fume Extraction?

Welding, a critical process in countless manufacturing and construction activities, generates fumes that pose significant health risks if not properly managed. Ensuring the safety of welders and compliance with health standards necessitates effective fume extraction systems.

This article will delve into the importance of understanding airflow and CFM in fume extraction, including a discussion on pressure drops and the difference between the maximum and operating airflow to guide you in making informed decisions for optimal workplace safety.

Definition of CFM and Equivalent in m³/h

Cubic Feet per Minute (CFM) is the unit of measure for the volume of air moved by the fume extraction system in one minute. It’s a critical factor in assessing the efficiency of fume extractors.

To convert CFM into cubic meters per hour (m³/h), multiply the CFM value by 1.7. This conversion is essential for comparing fume extraction requirements in different measurement systems.

Minimum Airflows Required for Good Results

The airflow for effective fume extraction varies significantly based on several factors, including welding parameters, welding position, proximity of the extractor, welded materials, and coatings on those materials.

Despite these variables, general guidelines exist for the minimum airflow needed for effective extraction, assuming the extractor is optimally positioned (maximum one diameter next to the weld pool or maximum three diameters above) and used in situations with low to medium welding parameters. If you need help selecting the right extractor size, we’ve created a guide for you.

Increasing the minimum airflow by 30% is often necessary for high-parameter welding or positions that make it more difficult for the extractor to capture the fume.

Fume Extraction MIG Gun

• 100 CFM: The standard requirement for a fume extraction MIG gun to capture and remove fumes efficiently.

Fume Extraction Arm

• 200 CFM for a 3″ arm: Suitable for smaller or more confined spaces.
• 300 CFM for a 4″ arm: Offers a balance between size and extraction capability.
• 600 CFM for a 6″ arm: Provides enhanced extraction for larger areas.
• 900 CFM for an 8″ arm: Not recommended due to its space requirements and high operational costs.

Fume Extraction Nozzle

• 200 CFM for a 2″ nozzle: Ideal for targeted extraction close to the source.
• 300 CFM for a 3″ nozzle: Balances coverage and efficiency.
• 400 CFM for a 4″ nozzle: Maximizes coverage for larger welding areas.

Fume Extraction Hood

The efficiency and required airflow vary widely depending on hood size, the inclusion of welding shields to contain fumes, and the specific welding process. Generally, fume extraction hoods are unsuitable for direct welder protection due to their positioning. However, they are excellent for robotic welding, offering unmatched efficiency.

Downdraft Table

Downdraft tables are often misconceived as suitable for welding fume extraction. The reality is that extracting upward-moving welding fumes from below is highly inefficient or prohibitively expensive. Downdraft tables are better suited for plasma cutting or grinding workstations, not welding fume extraction.

Any questions? Ask them directly in the chat at the bottom right of your screen or during one of our webinars.

Choosing the Right Vacuum Unit

Pressure Drops

Pressure drop is a crucial factor in the design and efficiency of fume extraction systems, defined as the decrease in air pressure from the system’s start to its end. This phenomenon is particularly relevant when considering the size of the extractor and its components.

Smaller extractors, while requiring lower airflow, often experience higher pressure drops due to increased friction and resistance within the narrow hoses and extraction units. This is because the smaller pathways to travel through create more resistance, significantly reducing the system’s ability to move air efficiently.

The relationship between extractor size, airflow, and pressure drop is crucial in fume extraction system design. Systems with smaller hoses and extractors, designed for precise, close-range fume capture, must operate at higher vacuums to overcome the pressure drops resulting from their compact design. Conversely, systems intended for broader area coverage, equipped with larger hoses and extractors, can move a higher air volume with comparatively lower vacuum pressure, benefiting from reduced friction and resistance along the air’s path.

Low-Vacuum/High-Volume vs. High-Vacuum/Low-Volume

This understanding of pressure drops and system design introduces the distinction between low-vacuum/high-volume (LVHV) and high-vacuum/low-volume (HVLV) systems:

Low-Vacuum/High-Volume (LVHV) systems are ideal for extracting fumes over larger areas. Due to their larger extractors and network, LVHV systems can move a high air volume at lower vacuum pressures, experiencing less pressure drop across the network. This setup is typically used with fume extraction arms or hoods.

In contrast, High-Vacuum/Low-Volume (HVLV) systems are tailored for targeted fume extraction close to the source, necessitating a high vacuum to effectively overcome the higher pressure drops associated with their smaller hoses and extractors. They are primarily used with fume extraction MIG guns and small extraction nozzles.

Maximum Airflow vs. Operating Airflow

Finally, understanding the difference between maximum and operating airflow is crucial when selecting a fume extraction system.

• Maximum Airflow: This refers to the theoretical maximum volume of air (measured in CFM) that a vacuum unit can move. It represents the extractor’s capacity under ideal, unobstructed conditions without pressure drops.
• Operating Airflow: In contrast, operating airflow is the actual volume of air moved during operation, taking into account the system’s design and any pressure drops that occur. This is a more accurate measure of the system’s efficiency in real-world conditions.

To illustrate the importance of considering operating airflow and the impact of pressure drops in a fume extraction system, let’s consider a scenario involving multiple fume extraction points:

Suppose you have a network of 10 fume extraction MIG guns in your welding operation. As a general rule of thumb, you would require a total airflow of 1000 CFM to extract the fumes these guns generated effectively. The pressure drops within this system—accounting for the extractor, hoses, ducting, and other components—might approximate 100 inches of water (H2O).

Now, consider a vacuum unit advertised with a maximum airflow of 10,000 CFM but a maximum vacuum capacity of only 20 inches of H2O (measured at 0 CFM). Despite the seemingly high airflow capability, this unit would be inadequate for your needs. The significant pressure drops across your fume extraction system would necessitate a much higher vacuum capability to move air effectively through all the components and maintain the required 100 CFM at each extraction point. In practical terms, this vacuum unit would likely only provide a small fraction of the necessary CFM at each extractor when in operation, rendering it unsuitable for the task at hand.

This example underscores the critical need to evaluate the operating airflow and the vacuum unit’s ability to overcome pressure drops within the system rather than relying solely on maximum airflow specifications.

Designing your Fume Extraction System

When selecting a suitable welding fume extractor, it’s essential to consider various factors, including the welding process, the type of technology ideal for that process, and the environment in which the welding occurs. The best extractors and technology, depending on the welding process, are presented in the table below.

Process	MIG gun	Arm	Nozzle	Hood	Table
Technology	HVLV	LVHV	HVLV	LVHV	LVHV
MIG / GMAW	Best	Yes	Yes	No	No
TIG / GTAW	No	Best	Yes	No	No
Fluxed-Cored / FCAW	Best	Yes	Yes	No	No
Stick / SMAW	No	Best	Yes	No	No
Robotic Welding	Yes	Yes	No	Best	No
Aluminum Welding	Best	Yes	Yes	No	No

Conclusion

Understanding the intricacies of CFM requirements, pressure drops, and the distinction between maximum and operating airflow is crucial for effectively designing and implementing welding fume extraction systems. By focusing on the operational performance necessary to maintain safe and compliant air quality levels rather than theoretical maximums, professionals can ensure their welding environments are safe and conducive to high productivity and health standards.